Posts Tagged ‘Sophie reads the Booker shortlist’

Julian Barnes wins the 2011 Man Booker Prize

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes won the 2011 Man Booker Prize last night.

“It is a very readable book, if I may use that word, but readable not only once but twice and even three times,” Chair of the Judges Stella Rimington said. “It is incredibly concentrated. Crammed into this short space is a great deal of information which you don’t get out of a first read.”  I suppose I’ll have to re-read it now, then; I must have missed a lot the first time around.  :-)

Barnes won it with his fourth nomination.  In his own words: “I didn’t want to go to my grave and get a Beryl” – aawwww!  Congratulations Mr. Barnes!  And, as Doctor Claw would probably say to Carol Birch, “Next time, Gadget!”

Booker Books: Jamrach’s Menagerie by Carol Birch

Monday, October 17th, 2011

This year, for reasons not entirely clear even to myself, I’ve decided to read and review (well, react to) the six books shortlisted for the 2011 Man Booker Prize (in order of what we have the most stock of). I read a varied lot of books, from Maggie O’Farrell to J. R. Ward to China Miéville to Louise Penny. I’m coming into the shortlisted books entirely blind – as in, I’ve not read any of these authors before, and I don’t know anything about the books either (not even what it says on the back!). I like to think that this means I have a completely fresh take on all of them. :-)

Jamrach’s Menagerie by Carol Birch

Publisher’s book description:

Young Jaffy Brown never expects to escape the slums of Victorian London. Then, aged eight, a chance encounter with Mr Jamrach changes Jaffy’s stars. And before he knows it, he finds himself at the docks waving goodbye to his beloved Ishbel and boarding a ship bound for the Indian Ocean. With his friend Tim at his side, Jaffy’s journey will push faith, love and friendship to their utmost limits.

Here is the Guardian’s review.

My take:

Next to Julian Barnes, Carol Birch is the only author on this year’s shortlist who has written more than 2 novels – and it shows. Both she and Barnes have developed a style that you can sink into, like a comfortable chair; Barnes’s chair is the one molded to your body, Birch’s chair the one that can twirl around all the way, hiding you completely while you get gleefully dizzy. The other writers are still too gimmicky (which isn’t to say they’ve not written good books, only they have to find their writing stride, still).

Jamrach’s Menagerie starts with our hero, Jaffy, moving from the worst part of Victorian London to the slightly less bad Ratcliffe Highway, where he gets swallowed by a tiger. The tiger has escaped from Mr. Jamrach’s Menagerie, where Jaffy soon finds a place to work among the exotic animals, along with Tim, a boy a few years older. Until, that is, both he and Tim go off on a whale boat to find a dragon for one of Mr. Jamrach’s wealthiest clients.

To me, Birch has written a more adult version of my childhood favorite De scheepsjongens van Bontekoe by Johan Fabricius (the English edition, The Cabin Boys of Bontekoe, is no longer in print). That, too, is a story of the high seas, full of sights seen through a boy’s eyes large with the new and undiscovered, and of the ultimate tragedy a sailor can experience. Birch, though, adds a terrible spin; one you hope, as a reader, never to have to face.

I found Birch’s descriptive writing absorbing, particularly the whaling: the horror of the dying animal, the days-long, filthy work of gutting and cleaning the carcass. I felt smack in the middle of everything, from that whaling to the drunken revelry after reaching port, to the humid, tense tracking of the beast. The only jarring note for me was the blurring of timelines now and again, where the boy on the boat morphed into the older man looking back, without warning.

This is Carol Birch’s 11th novel, and the first to be short-listed for the Booker (although Turn Again Home was long-listed). Of the five I’ve read now, I’ve found this to be the most complete book, where the balance of style, plot, engagement, and message is best.

Previous Booker Books: The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes, The Sisters Brothers by Patrick DeWitt, Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman, and Snowdrops by A. D. Miller.

Next up: Well, it should be Half Blood Blues by Esi Edugyan, but I haven’t the time before the awards ceremony tomorrow evening! I have read the first few chapters, though, and so far I’ve found it hard going. The setting for the book is World War II, and to be honest, I don’t think I can stand to read another book about that era, even if it is about Afro-German jazz trumpeters, which is about the only angle this war hasn’t been covered by in literature. With my luck, it’ll probably win. :-) Here’s the Guardian’s review of it, to tide you over!

By Sophie.

Booker Books: Snowdrops by A. D. Miller

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

This year, for reasons not entirely clear even to myself, I’ve decided to read and review (well, react to) the six books shortlisted for the 2011 Man Booker Prize (in order of what we have the most stock of). I read a varied lot of books, from Maggie O’Farrell to J. R. Ward to China Miéville to Louise Penny. I’m coming into the shortlisted books entirely blind – as in, I’ve not read any of these authors before, and I don’t know anything about the books either (not even what it says on the back!). I like to think that this means I have a completely fresh take on all of them. :-)

Snowdrops by A. D. Miller

Publisher’s book description:

Snowdrops. That’s what the Russians call them – the bodies that float up into the light in the thaw. Drunks, most of them, and homeless people who just give up and lie down into the whiteness, and murder victims hidden in the drifts by their killers. Nick has a confession. When he worked as a high-flying British lawyer in Moscow, he was seduced by Masha, an enigmatic woman who led him through her city: the electric nightclubs and intimate dachas, the human kindnesses and state-wide corruption. Yet as Nick fell for Masha, he found that he fell away from himself; he knew that she was dangerous, but life in Russia was addictive, and it was too easy to bury secrets – and corpses – in the winter snows…

Here is the Guardian’s review.

My take:

Fear the dark side, Nick.

Nick is a thirty-something corporate lawyer living out his pre-midlife-crisis in the Wild East that was (is?) Russia and especially Moscow a few years after the fall of the Iron Curtain.  He is writing down the story of his time there as a kind of confession to his nameless fiancée; he feels she should know everything there is to know about the man she is to marry in a few years – warts and all.  And the story is a grimy one, as Nick finds himself falling for Masha as well as involved in shady business dealings.  Life in Moscow is a slippery slope, both literally (those brutal Russian winters) and figuratively (he identifies several moments throughout the story where he might have done things differently to redeem himself).

The strength of this story lies in the fact that you keep turning the pages to see what happens next.  You can feel yourself liberating your morality along with Nick, without knowing quite how to have kept it.  Miller writes with first-hand experience about the intoxicating life of an expat in Russia, where all boundaries fade the longer you stay, and where anything is possible provided you have the money or the connections.  I really got a sense of walking around there, of the sense of the Russian people, the bitter cold of the winters.  Also, his infrequent asides to his fiancée I found very insightful – here is a man, broken and battered, fully conscious now of the deplorable situations he was in then, yet still yearning for that time in a way, too.  All I can say is that I sincerely hope the future Mrs. Nick does a runner!

This is A. D. Miller’s first novel, although he has written a biography called The Earl of Petticoat Lane.  I found it moody and absorbing, despite the fact that Nick is not a very likeable character, overall.  Then again, he lives in an alien and inhospitable world that is threatening to eat his soul.  Will it win?  I think that, overall, it’s a strong contender.

Previous Booker BooksThe Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes, The Sisters Brothers by Patrick DeWitt, and Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman.

Next up: Jamrach’s Menagerie by Carol Birch.

By Sophie

Booker Books: Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman

Friday, September 30th, 2011

This year, for reasons not entirely clear even to myself, I’ve decided to read and review (well, react to) the six books shortlisted for the 2011 Man Booker Prize (in order of what we have the most stock of). I read a varied lot of books, from Maggie O’Farrell to J. R. Ward to China Miéville to Louise Penny. I’m coming into the shortlisted books entirely blind – as in, I’ve not read any of these authors before, and I don’t know anything about the books either (not even what it says on the back!). I like to think that this means I have a completely fresh take on all of them. :-)

Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman

Publisher’s book description:

Newly arrived from Ghana with his mother and older sister, eleven-year-old Harrison Opoku lives on the ninth floor of a block of flats on an inner-city housing estate. The second best runner in the whole of Year 7, Harri races through his new life in his personalised trainers – the Adidas stripes drawn on with marker pen – blissfully unaware of the very real threat all around him. With equal fascination for the local gang – the Dell Farm Crew – and the pigeon who visits his balcony, Harri absorbs the many strange elements of his new life in England: watching, listening, and learning the tricks of urban survival. But when a boy is knifed to death on the high street and a police appeal for witnesses draws only silence, Harri decides to start a murder investigation of his own. In doing so, he unwittingly endangers the fragile web his mother has spun around her family to try and keep them safe. A story of innocence and experience, hope and harsh reality, Pigeon English is a spellbinding portrayal of a boy balancing on the edge of manhood and of the forces around him that try to shape the way he falls.

Here is the Guardian’s review.

My take:

I was in tears at the end of this book.  I sat on the balcony and had myself a good cry – because the book was finished.  I had come to love Harri, the narrator, that much.

Harri (Harrison in full) is a young boy (about eleven or so) from Ghana who has recently moved to a very nasty part of London with his mother and sister (his father and grandmother and younger sister are to join them as soon as they have the money for plane tickets).  The book starts with Harri and his friend Jordan standing outside Chicken Joe’s, looking at the pool of blood where a boy from the neighborhood has been stabbed to death.  This is what the boys say:

Jordan: ‘I’ll give you a million quid if you touch it.’

Me: ‘You don’t have a million.’

Jordan: ‘One quid then.’

This is the book in a nutshell, to me.  Harri, who witnesses horrible situations and dangerous people, but who is, at the same time, a young kid that finds that life – the world – is one magnificent, marvelous, endless, wondrous game, to be fully explored. He and his other friend Dean decide to investigate the killing by gathering fingerprints with sticky tape and staking out the neighborhood with the help of Harri’s dinky binoculars and more of those types of romantically optimistic and totally unrealistic schemes.  And yet, and yet…

I’m lucky enough to be the mother of a daughter around Harri’s age, and I can tell you that the flitting from one subject to another is entirely realistic.  So is the skipping from something serious to something silly, almost in one breath – for example, a friend of Harri’s buries guns for the local gang in backyards (as a kind of initiation), and when Harri hears of this, he immediately imagines a gun tree, with little baby guns on the branches.  It’s this glorious, silly instantaneous imagination that made me fall in love with Harri, and made me fear for him when the Dell Farm Crew would be walking past, or Uncle Julius, even if Harri was obviously not worried.

Another part of the book that I relished was the language Harri and his family use.  “Gowayou!” or “Advise yourself!” are terms that have crept into my own conversations.

The only jarring note in the book was the voice of the pigeon Harri tries to befriend.  Every now and again he would crop up and dispense wisdom in italics, and although he’s absolutely necessary to the story, these short talks felt a little odd.

Pigeon English is Stephen Kelman’s first novel.  I think it’s obvious that I loved it.  :-)   Three more to go, and so far this is the one that I connected to the most.  Will it win?  I’m not sure; it might be too “loud” to win a Booker.  And that pigeon bothered me, but, boy, did Kelman ever manage to paint a picture of a horrible place between the lines of an exuberant and endearing boy’s chatter.  Teachers, if you’re reading, consider this book for your classrooms!

Previous Booker Books: The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes and The Sisters Brothers by Patrick DeWitt.

Next up: Snowdrops by A. D. Miller.

By Sophie.

Booker Books: The Sisters Brothers by Patrick DeWitt

Monday, September 26th, 2011

This year, for reasons not entirely clear even to myself, I’ve decided to read and review (well, react to) the six books shortlisted for the 2011 Man Booker Prize (in order of what we have the most stock of). I read a varied lot of books, from Maggie O’Farrell to J. R. Ward to China Miéville to Louise Penny. I’m coming into the shortlisted books entirely blind – as in, I’ve not read any of these authors before, and I don’t know anything about the books either (not even what it says on the back!). I like to think that this means I have a completely fresh take on all of them. :-)

The Sisters Brothers by Patrick DeWitt

Publisher’s book description:

Oregon, 1851. Eli and Charlie Sisters, notorious professional killers, are on their way to California to kill a man named Hermann Kermit Warm. On the way, the brothers have a series of unsettling and violent experiences in the Darwinian landscape of Gold Rush America. Charlie makes money and kills anyone who stands in his way; Eli doubts his vocation and falls in love. And they bicker a lot. Then they get to California, and discover that Warm is an inventor who has come up with a magical formula, which could make all of them very rich. What happens next is utterly gripping, strange and sad. Told in deWitt’s darkly comic and arresting style, The Sisters Brothers is the kind of Western the Coen Brothers might write – stark, unsettling and with a keen eye for the perversity of human motivation. Like his debut novel Ablutions, The Sisters Brothers is a novel about the things you tell yourself in order to be able to continue to live the life you find yourself in, and what happens when those stories no longer work. It is an inventive and strange and beautifully controlled piece of fiction, which shows an exciting expansion of DeWitt’s range.

Here’s the Guardian’s review.

My take:

This must be the most deadpan novel I have ever read.

Told from the perspective of younger brother Eli Sisters, a rather kind-hearted, soft-bellied man despite forming half of a notorious killing squad, it feels like he and his brother Charlie are marionets, woodenly walking through 1850s Oregon and Gold Rush-mad California and having things happen to them rather than taking destiny firmly into their own hands.  Not that this is detrimental to the story; I really rather enjoyed their wooden speech and slow-forming thoughts.  I was retelling parts of the story to someone, and found myself giggling (which I wasn’t doing as I was reading the book). Plotwise, basically, the Sisters brothers are told by their boss, the Commodore, to find and kill a man named Hermann Kermit Warm, and they travel from Oregon to California in search of him.  Things don’t go entirely as planned.

I liked this book.  I found its writing style interesting, and Charlie and Eli (and Hermann) become lifelike enough to start to care for.  Eli is obviously not right for the job of killing people, but does it capably anyway (…).  His thoughts and decisions take a while to form while Charlie takes the lead in the search, but Eli is made of tougher stuff than he realizes, and once he decides on something, he will follow his decision through to the end.  It’s really the story of coming into your own, discovering what it is you are meant to do and be.  I don’t know enough of the Wild West to say if it gives an impression in line with history, but I certainly felt the dust and the slowing down of time, and the strange types drawn to California in search of gold felt entirely believable, too.  The one mistake I made was reading the word “miniature dragon” where I should have read “miniature dragoon” at the very beginning of the story, and it took me half the book to realize this was a regular Western, and not Cowboys & Aliens.  ^^

This is Patrick DeWitt’s second novel (after Ablutions), and I found it interesting and odd.  Four more to go, so I don’t know how it will hold up, but despite its stand-offish manner, or maybe because of it, I preferred this one over Julian Barnes.

Previous Booker Book: The Sense of an Ending by Julian Barnes.

Next up: Pigeon English by Stephen Kelman.

By Sophie.