Posts Tagged ‘katherine matthews’

You Review: Creative Intelligence – Bruce Nussbaum

Wednesday, March 20th, 2013

Reviewed by Katherine Matthews

This book is called Creative Intelligence and the tag-line reads “Harnessing the Power to Create, Connect, and Inspire” – Before we go any further, let’s set the record straight: This is not a book about creativity, this is a book about business innovation. The author does spend the first chapter trying to explain how the two are interchangeable if not the same thing, but… they’re not. If you’re interested in one and not the other, as I am, the difference between the two is stark, and does not diminish just because he’s said so. So, for best results, ignore the title. If you’re interested in business innovation, carry on.

The author, Bruce Nussbaum, seems to start with a few assumptions about his reader that are not implicit from the title. The first is that you – the reader – are not creative or do not see yourself as creative, but he can manage to convince you that, actually, many things you do are in fact creative. It’s a really strange place to start, but it makes evident that he’s trying to home in on people who are motivated by business, logic and bottom lines and don’t understand or sympathize with the touchy-feely-ness of creativity. Well, fair enough, but once again, this doesn’t come across until after you’re already knee-deep.

What’s strange too is how openly patronizing he is towards his readers. For example, “For some people, building upon their Creative Intelligence might mean taking an edgy photo and sharing it with Instagram. For others, it might mean launching a storefront on Etsy or Amazon. We all have the ability to make things, and while we might not know how to use the tools that make creation possible just yet, those tools exist and they have never been as inexpensive to access or easy to master.” Does he really think that the most creative thing his readers are capable of is taking an Instagram photo or opening an Etsy shop? At this point, I have no idea who he thinks his audience is, though perhaps he’s surprised they’ve picked up a book at all.

Which brings me to another elephant in the room when reading this book: The author never leaves the page. That is, it’s riddled with “I” and “me” stories, and every time he wants to submit a new concept or word, he makes sure that you know that it’s his word, his concept: “another strategy I call ‘donut thinking.’”, “I’ll introduce a competency that’s all about rethinking the many ways we engage”, etc. He apparently is far too insecure to trust that you’ve read his name on the front of the book cover. He even finds ways to integrate the most random stories from his life to make himself sound a certain way, like “I was in the Peace Corps in the Philippines in 1968 when I went up into the Cordilleras mountains in Luzon to see the rice terraces of the Igorot, a highland people. A local chief asked me to stay to eat. Though eager to see more of the rice terraces and get back to Manila, this was the land of the Igorot and I was a visitor, so I accepted.” He then goes on to describe eating monkey’s brains at their behest, to prove himself as part of their community. Now, let’s just recall that this is a book called Creative Intelligence and I’ll let you draw your own conclusions about how this story might have anything to do with the topic at hand, other than providing a platform for the author’s vainglory in trying to make himself sound like he’s 1) worldly 2) empathetic and 3) accepted.

In another part of the book, he talks about a new species of frog that was discovered in New York after a scientist realized the break in his croak was a marked distinction. The frog had not yet been named because the discoverer was too conflicted about naming the frog after the region in which he had been discovered. Nussbaum writes, “I think a better solution would be to name [the frog] after the discoverer, the scientist who knew the pattern well enough to hear the break.” And it seems embarrassingly apparent what his personal hopes are, regarding the future naming of his ideas and discoveries.

It’s also a relatively superficial examination of the turmoil inherent in a process of creativity. Issues like failure and angst are covered parenthetically at best, with a light brush-off that failure is completely tolerable when simply re-framed as lessons learned. In fact, the book is little more than a recitation of ideas of business and marketing that have worked over the years. In this way, this book on “creativity” is remarkably – dare I say it – uncreative.

Overall, the success of the book depends on your level of interest in business and business innovation. If you’re interested in ways that people have commoditized their ideas, and you would like a nice airport read, here’s a book for you.

You Review: The latest releases, reviewed by ABC customers.

You Review: In One Person by John Irving

Wednesday, May 30th, 2012

Reviewed by Katherine Matthews

In One Person is the latest book from prolific American writer John Irving, lucky number thirteen of his novels. Our narrator, Billy Abbott, is a man roughly seventy years old, looking back on his life complicated by a confused sexual identity, tracing its roots and evolution. As usual, Irving chooses characters which fall into somewhat peripheral and perverse realms, and makes them utterly approachable and sympathetic.

Using the broad view of the character’s life, from birth to old age, there’s time enough to get under the character’s skin. Billy slowly comes to terms with his growing attraction to men and men dressed as women, meanwhile unveiling the secrets of his family which ensure that no one’s closet is kept free from skeletons.

Initially, the distance with which Billy looks back on his troubled childhood is rather remote: an old man talking about his first crushes at such length is somewhat hard to connect to. Yet, as the story evolves into adulthood, through the decades, time becomes an unstoppably relevant factor, as attitudes towards sexual identity change, and things which do not even have a name later form communities. Irving stops short of making this a political novel, though. He sticks to creating relatable characters and, while the characters make their views known, it never takes the tone of a polemic.

Irving fans will no doubt recognize a slew of his repeated themes: coming-of-age stories, characters that live in Vienna during their youth, wrestling, sexual deviance, an extended family bonded together by their quirks, and so on. Even the structure here is relatively familiar: a slow unpacking of youth, a view into adulthood, and then a deconstruction of the world he’s created by people leaving or dying. In this regard, if you’re an Irving fan, you’ll be comforted by another beautiful novel in his usual vein. What is different about In One Person is perhaps the lack of a central love story – the book title alone gestures towards the multitude of love interests that the main character has. Yet Irving writes love well, even (or especially?) complex love between screwed up people.

You Review: The latest releases, reviewed by ABC customers.

If you’d like to join in and get free books and ABC gift vouchers, see the original post for more details.

YOUR Favorite Reads of 2011

Friday, January 6th, 2012

We asked for it, and you sent them, in droves: Your Favorite Reads of 2011!  Thank you so much for sharing your favorite reads with us (and that so many of you took the time to write your favorites down!).

Now, I know this is one *massive* post, but sometimes, spending quality time pondering highly recommended titles all gathered together can be the best half hour of your day.  If you want short cuts, though, click on their names for the favorites of Patty Friedrichs, David Swatling, Katherine Matthews, Keefe Cordeiro, Jonathan de Souza, Gabriëlle Linger, Retno Trimbos, Sara van Bussel, Marjolein Balm, Natalie Gerritsen, Em Angevaare, Oona Juutinen, and Ellyn Cook.

Here’s to 2012 holding as many good reads as 2011.  :-)

(more…)

You Review: Deceit and Self-Deception by Robert Trivers

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

Reviewed by Katherine Matthews

Deceit and Self-Deception by Robert L. Trivers is a wide-angle look at deception, its origins, functions and results. Trivers identifies at the beginning that it’s still an infant field; much more research needs to be done, so it’s an exploratory effort. This initially frees Trivers up to write hypothetically or contemplatively, which gives the writing a lot of energy. The book starts out really strong, and even gave me quite an emotional reaction, imagining the various ways that both deceit and self-deception have been a part of my own life.

He goes into the ways deception is used in nature (that is, outside of humans), and various ways individuals, couples, or family units deceive or self-deceive. These sections were, for me, the most informative and relevant to the topic.

Later in the book, Trivers introduces the concept of false historical narratives, ways that whole societies deceive by, for example, writing themselves as the righteous victor of wars, or the validated aggressors. It’s a valid discussion, but around this section, the book sort of loses the plot, and feels much more like a personal soapbox. Trivers takes on highly controversial topics like war, politics and religion. He presents a series of facts giving one perspective (because, being the nature of controversial topics, different facts can be perceived differently by other people), and basically asserts this as “the truth”, which means that if you disagree with him, you’re a pawn of a false historical narrative (i.e. you’ve been deceived, and you’re still self-deceiving). Even when I agreed with him in his telling of the story, I really resented the implication, as well as the author himself, for using his work on deception to push forward other agendas.

As an example, he writes on the 2003 US war on Iraq, “Using the false pretext of 9/11, it was a war of choice and aggression apparently designed for control of oil and related economic assets, as well as to build a regional power base and to support its joined-at-the-hip ally, Israel.”  Later, he questions why women are left out of the Catholic church and says “What continually haunts me when I think about such matters is the function of all this nonsense. Who benefits from an all-male priesthood?”  Then later, on discussing physics, “When I read of nine billion euros spent on a supercollider in which tiny particles are accelerated to incredible speeds and then run into one another, I think ‘bombs.’ This factor may lead to more resources being directed towards physics and to some subareas than is objectively sensible, but it is unlikely to have much effect on constructing theory.”

For me, as a reader, it almost doesn’t matter to me if facts are on his side because I find his writing so biased towards giving a particular perspective, that all the trust is lost. He asserts his perspective as neutral and factual, and if you’re so naive to disagree with him, you’re self-deceiving or you’ve been deceived. Can you imagine this guy at a party? You’ve probably met him and avoided him all night. He writes on each of these vast subjects as an absolute authority, but I’m not able to take him as one. Instead, I feel manipulated and preached to.

(Blogmistress’s note: In the US, this book has been published under the title The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life.  Unless, of course, we’ve all been lied to.)

You Review: The latest releases, reviewed by ABC customers.

If you’d like to join in and get free books and ABC gift vouchers, see the original post for more details.

You Review: IQ84 by Haruki Murakami

Tuesday, October 25th, 2011

Reviewed by Katherine Matthews

1Q84 (on sale October 25th 2011) is the latest work from well-known Japanese author Haruki Murakami, a nearly 1,000 page tome in three books. The vastness of this novel has drawn a lot of attention, including the sell-out of the Japanese version of the novel on its release day, and the sale of one million copies within the first month – in other words, the stakes are high.

The novel begins with the ignition of two separate stories being developed in parallel (fans of Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World will recognize this style, and appreciate the skill with which he uses it). On one path is the character Aomame, a young fitness instructor-cum-assassin who whiles away the lonely nights seducing strangers in bars. On the other path is Tengo, a math instructor and aspiring novelist who is talked into rewriting someone else’s novel to fraudulently win a prize. The two paths progress simultaneously, unconnected, leading the astute reader to know that their crossing is inevitable, provoking questions and creating tension.

The story takes place in the year 1984, though begins with a character noticing that something is surely out of place, and reality has switched to another plane. She names this alternate reality 1Q84. Murakami’s ability to describe intricate details of their world, and make it indistinguishable from our world except for a minor detail, is another element of his ability to create a world that we’re able to walk into without hesitation. It’s familiar, and as the small strange nuance is wedged deeper into fantasy, it’s believable.

The themes that 1Q84 explores are not unique and could trespass quickly into pulp: assassins, cult religions, conspiracy and fraud, private investigation and child molestation. Yet, his writing has the absolute charm to bypass your intellectual side and connect directly with your emotional core, childlike and fantastical. He creates the mood that lets you easily follow him, into the dream.

What is primarily masterful about Murakami’s writing is his ability to peel away the layers slowly, revealing details as reticently as secrets. The result is simply superb, structurally: it progresses the story, provides character development, and creates a desire to want to know more. What makes it remarkable is that he can do all this without drawing too much attention to himself as the architect.

With a work this long, it’s hard to condense the overall impression into a singular perspective. However, I do believe the book is best when experienced with as little detailed knowledge about the plot as possible, so I’ll avoid it. The first book is primarily setup, and the second book is a tense and magical experience, which for me was the height of a connection with the characters and the story. The third book, strangely, dropped all tension and actually turned into something rather slow – what someone holding a 940 page book fears most, to be honest. A private investigator turns to recapitulating the events of the story so far; the characters stop “doing” things and instead just reflect on their thoughts. It was agonizing, in the sense that, prior to the third book, I was completely captivated, and now I was afraid I might start skipping pages or even feel the book was “ruined” by the poor decision to make the book longer than it needed to be. It is just a slow spot to work through, though, and he does eventually pull the work back together for the conclusion. Could the book have benefited from a more ruthless editor? I believe so, unfortunately.

1Q84 is, as a title, a reference to Orwell’s 1984 (the ‘Q’ is pronounced as ‘9’ in Japanese), though the correlation between the subjects of the works are not so tangible. If anything, 1984’s Big Brother character, obvious and looming in his direct power, is contrasted against the concept of 1Q84’s Little People, invisible, omniscient characters who shape our reality, unbeknownst to us. Yet this is a relationship drawn literally in the book (it references the book 1984 a few times, in addition to many other works, actually), and not a relationship that I feel so implicitly by the content of the book itself. It’s not a political work, at least in my opinion. Ultimately, it carries themes of religion, taking risks for your beliefs or passions, patience and devotion, but my opinion is that it is, at its heart, a love story. (Hey, come to think of it, so was 1984!)

Murakami leaves many questions unanswered in this work, as in many of his other works. (Other questions, he answers to redundant levels of detail.) The result is possibly the same as events which occur in real life: there are unknowns remaining to speculate on, which will never be known for certain, but the process of speculating is the pleasure.

Ultimately, 1Q84 is an astounding work, creative and meticulous. It’s original, and yet still fulfills the name of a Murakami work.

You Review: The latest releases, reviewed by ABC customers.

If you’d like to join in and get free books and ABC gift vouchers, see the original post for more details.